Download: RSS | Email Alerts | Text Alerts | Mobile
 

Suit filed in Ark. over casino petition rejection


Story Comments Share
(file photo)
(file photo)
Tags:
Updated: 8/03/2012 7:46 pm Published: 8/03/2012 7:45 pm
LITTLE ROCK, Ark. (AP) - A Texas businessman seeking a constitutional amendment that would grant him the exclusive right to build casinos in Arkansas sued election officials on Friday for rejecting his attempt to place the issue on the state's November ballot.

Michael Wasserman asked the Arkansas Supreme Court on Friday to order the secretary of state to give him additional time to gather signatures supporting his casino-legalization proposal. Secretary of State Mark Martin's office said last month that Wasserman had fallen short of the number of signatures required to put the issue before voters in November during an initial count.

Proposed constitutional amendments need at least 78,133 signatures from registered voters to qualify for the ballot.

But Wasserman didn't meet an additional requirement that signatures from at least 15 counties equal at least 5 percent of the votes cast in the last governor's election - he fell short in Prairie, Saline and Woodruff counties. Wasserman's lawsuit said that the 15-county rule should not apply since he turned in more than the minimum number of signatures.

"What the secretary of state has done that has precipitated this action is to thwart the rule of the people," Wasserman's lawsuit said. "He has interposed himself and his office between the petitioner and the petitioner's right to have the decision concerning the matters concerned in the petition made by the people of Arkansas."

A spokesman for Martin's office did not have an immediate comment on the lawsuit. Martin's office had rejected Wasserman's request for more time.

Wasserman's proposal would have given him exclusive rights to operate casinos in seven Arkansas counties. His was one of two competing casino proposals vying for spots on the November ballot.

Professional poker player Nancy Todd has proposed an amendment that would give her exclusive rights to operate casinos in four Arkansas counties. Election officials last week gave her 30 days to gather additional signatures after she fell short of signatures from registered voters. Todd was given the additional time since she had cleared an initial count and the 15-county requirement.

Had both measures made the ballot and been approved by voters, only the one that received the most votes would have been enacted since the proposals were conflicting measures. Both face strong opposition from anti-gambling groups, as well as a West Memphis dog track and a Hot Springs horse track that also offer electronic gambling such as video poker.

(Copyright 2012 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.)
Story Comments Share
9 Comment(s)
Comments: Show | Hide

Here are the most recent story comments.View All

The views expressed here do not necessarily represent those of FOX16 - Breaking News and Weather to Plan Your Day for Little Rock and Central Arkansas

coffman71 - 8/7/2012 10:15 AM
0 Votes
Personally don't care for casonos or any type of gambling so I could care less if either make it to the ballad. BUT if your going to spend the money and time to allow a vote or amend our state constitution it needs to be a free and open market, not just one entity having all the rights to do business. I thing the state should throw them both out or have one issue to vote on giving complete access to anyone to build casinos. Those who support the issues and would vote for the amendments need to stop and think about the "exclusive right, certain counties" clause in these and not just "Ohh I want a casino in Arkansas", no one should have the right to do any business exclusively. Competition is healthy for good business practices.

itsjustme - 8/6/2012 7:37 AM
1 Vote
Im all for casinos in Arkansas, but Im totally against Todd and Wasserman having exclusive rights.

Butch54 - 8/5/2012 11:37 AM
0 Votes
I'm for casinos and pot. Get them both on the ballot. Can't wait to get high and throw money into a rich owners hand. LOL. These two things rent a lot of head space in Arkansas. I could care less. Do what you want is my motto.

gwininator - 8/4/2012 2:37 PM
2 Votes
Have nothing against casinos but really have a problem allowing a monopoly to one person from out of state to operate casinos in Ar. Guess I'm an ignorant old woman but doesn't seem right to me. They already have casinos in W. Memphis and H. Springs. How did they get to operate under current Ar. laws?

Alchemist - 8/4/2012 1:47 PM
0 Votes
The state added additional requirements to keep the casino vote off of the ballot yet, it appears that the state is bending over backwards to make sure the marihuana issue gets on the ballot adequate signatures or not.

hawk1972 - 8/4/2012 6:25 AM
1 Vote
i am for the casion's and lets move into the 21 century in this state

ArkansasYankee - 8/3/2012 11:03 PM
0 Votes
What's with these two wanting exclusive rights? If we are to have casino's, why can't anyone build 'em? Think maybe the poker player paid off the right people, and the Texas businessman didn't as far as ballot issues go?

icom319 - 8/3/2012 9:49 PM
0 Votes
if it put on ballot then anyone that want can put a casino in any county they want. why should certin county get preference over any other county.

LifeNArkansas - 8/3/2012 8:50 PM
3 Votes
Put it on the ballot already and let the people decide!
The links below are paid advertisements. FOX16 is not responsible for their content.
Current Conditions
72°
High: 89° | Low: 71°
Partly Cloudy
Inergize Digital This site is hosted and managed by Inergize Digital.
Mobile advertising for this site is available on Local Ad Buy.