Download: RSS | Email Alerts | Text Alerts | Mobile
 
Tornado Watch expires at 6:00 AM on 5/20, issued at 10:44 PM Alma, AR | Avoca, AR | Bella Vista, AR | Bentonville, AR

Ark. police expect suit after squad car shooting


Story Comments Share
Tags:
Updated: 9/04/2012 4:53 pm Published: 9/04/2012 4:50 pm
LITTLE ROCK, Ark. (AP) - Attorneys for the family of a young man who was fatally shot in an Arkansas patrol car have asked police to preserve evidence about his death, and police say they are preparing for a likely lawsuit.

Lawyers for Chavis Carter's family haven't spelled out what kind of legal action they anticipate filing in the coming months, but they said negligence likely will play a role after a Jonesboro police officer searched Carter twice but didn't find the gun that authorities say he used to shoot himself in the head.

"We're waiting to see all the facts. Then, we'll file appropriately," said one of the family's lawyers, Benjamin Irwin. "... But clearly negligence is going to be a part of it."

Meanwhile, Jonesboro Police Chief Michael Yates said last week that police wouldn't grant interviews as they were consulting attorneys, though he did respond to written questions from The Associated Press.

"In preparation for civil action, the investigation continues so that we may identify all parties associated with the case and seek additional witnesses if they can be identified and located," Yates said in an email.

A state crime lab report concluded that Carter, 21, was on meth when he fatally shot himself in the head while his hands were cuffed behind his back on July 28 in Jonesboro, about 130 miles northeast of Little Rock. The officer who searched Carter twice and found marijuana but no gun was reprimanded, but has since returned back to work. Police said another officer who stopped a truck in which Carter was a passenger was cleared of any wrongdoing.

"I think there was a high degree of negligence that night," Irwin said. "They had a duty and responsibility to search this man and at some point in time a gun ended up in the backseat of this car and this young man lost his life while in police custody. That in itself is not supposed to happen."

Michael Johnson, who teaches criminal law and other courses at the University of Arkansas at Little Rock law school, said he could see a suit involving negligence if what police have said is true.

"The failure to adequately search and find a weapon, boy, that, I think puts the police department in a tough spot," said Johnson, a former federal prosecutor.

Plus, Johnson said, "There's a certain common sense reaction of: How could this possibly have happened that way?"

Authorities say other people have managed to shoot themselves while in handcuffs. Less than two weeks after Carter was shot in Arkansas, police in Mobile, Ala., said a man shot himself in the torso while he was handcuffed in the back of a squad car. Unlike Carter, that man survived.

A young man in Indianapolis did not. Police said 16-year-old Michael Taylor shot himself in the head in the back of a squad car while handcuffed in 1987.

His mother sued the city and police officers, arguing that her son's fatal wound was the result of "the careless and negligent conduct of the defendants..." A jury agreed and awarded Taylor's mother millions of dollars, though a judge and state appeals court later reduced the amount. Then, in 2000, Taylor's family agreed to a settlement in which the city would pay them close to $2 million, according to The Indianapolis Star.

"Lawsuits are common in all in custody death cases," Yates said.

(Copyright 2012 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.)
Story Comments Share
7 Comment(s)
Comments: Show | Hide

Here are the most recent story comments.View All

The views expressed here do not necessarily represent those of FOX16 - Breaking News and Weather to Plan Your Day for Little Rock and Central Arkansas

sickofthissht - 9/5/2012 6:50 PM
0 Votes
suicide is sad and his parents should be suing. whoever keeps complaining about his picture is an idiot, your mom and dad must be brother and sister or dad and daughter. the latter most likely. i hope his family wins the lawsuit not for the money just to keep police in check, they have rules to follow and they should be followed.

wpsark - 9/5/2012 9:11 AM
1 Vote
well there's the missing segments of the video and the failure to test for gun shot residue when that would have been crucial evidence. I doubt the truth will ever come out.

ArkansasYankee - 9/4/2012 11:40 PM
2 Votes
Is this a great country or what! A wanted drug addicts parents possibly making millions of off us taxpayers!

ArkansasYankee - 9/4/2012 11:39 PM
2 Votes
Wish they would quit saying the gun was missed after two searches. He was placed in the patrol car after the initial search, uncuffed; so he had the opportunity to stash the weapon. I am somewhat concerned about the missing part of the cam video. Still smells to me. These people related to Pres. Nixon? Call it Karma, fate, God's Hand or whatever; this turd was flushed; now if the story would just flush!

guzzler - 9/4/2012 7:52 PM
2 Votes
Would you please quit showing this pic of this ghetto thug high on meth, pain pills and malt liquor? It is degrading enough for his baby momma to know she raised such a loser and then you have to show his high, high, high, thug pic over, and over, and over, spare da baby momma and spare us all

Butch54 - 9/4/2012 7:41 PM
2 Votes
Remember that little story I told about lies. Why does this keep coming back like a turd that will not flush. Because when you don't tell the truth you have to keep propping it up. Two searches and no gun found. But they did find a small amount of dope. Which was biggest. I bet the gun. Cuffed behind his back and shot through the temple. Then where is the whole tape. Not a reenactment of anything. Where is the part they cut out of the real tape. Looks like another WM3 situation in the making. Never put your trust in a police officer. Even if I have 3 family member in the protect and serve department. I don't fully trust them. The biggest bottom line is the officers messed up. Faulty search. Remember this is not a criminal case now. It will be a civil case. Remember OJ. Only this time it will be us that pay for the shoddy work of those two officers. Who even cares if he deserved to be shot. The problem is not him but the workmanship of the officers on the scene. Who did they protect and serve here. Not the guy in cuffs for sure.

protector20 - 9/4/2012 7:04 PM
4 Votes
So now that the coroner finally determined the meth-head offed himself, the family believes the taxpayers should cough up some dough. I hope there is at least 4 sane people on any jury that hears this case.
The links below are paid advertisements. FOX16 is not responsible for their content.
Current Conditions
76°
High: 88° | Low: 70°
Mostly Cloudy
Inergize Digital This site is hosted and managed by Inergize Digital.
Mobile advertising for this site is available on Local Ad Buy.