Download: RSS | Email Alerts | Text Alerts | Mobile
 

High court to decide double jeopardy question


Story Comments Share
(File)
(File)
Tags:
Updated: 10/11/2011 1:21 pm Published: 10/11/2011 1:21 pm

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court will decide whether a jury forewoman's offhand comment that the jury was unable to make a decision on a murder charge means the suspect can't be retried on that charge.

The high court on Tuesday agreed to hear an appeal from Alex Blueford, whose murder trial in Arkansas ended in a hung jury.

The jury forewoman told the judge before he declared a mistrial that the jury had voted unanimously against capital murder and first-degree murder.

Blueford argued that her statement means he has been acquitted of capital murder and first-degree murder — because she said it in open court.

He argued that he could not be retried because of Fifth Amendment double jeopardy protections.

Arkansas courts have disagreed.

The case is 10-1320, Blueford v. Arkansas.

 

©2011 Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Story Comments Share
1 Comment(s)
Comments: Show | Hide

Here are the most recent story comments.View All

The views expressed here do not necessarily represent those of FOX16 - Breaking News and Weather to Plan Your Day for Little Rock and Central Arkansas

Tired - 10/12/2011 7:52 AM
0 Votes
there's a reason the jury passes a piece of paper to the judge....there's a reason the foreperson of the jury is the only one that speaks...there's a reason the foreperson says very specific things...the judge should have covered that in jury instuctions....now we got to let an obvious thug go...don't ya'll feel stupid now...if you don't you should
The links below are paid advertisements. FOX16 is not responsible for their content.
Current Conditions
70°
High: 86° | Low: 57°
Mostly Cloudy
Inergize Digital This site is hosted and managed by Inergize Digital.
Mobile advertising for this site is available on Local Ad Buy.