Ark. congressional candidate arrested for DWI

Download: RSS | Email Alerts | Text Alerts | Mobile

FOX16 - Little Rock, Arkansas News and Weather

Breaking News

AR State Treasurer Arrested

Ark. congressional candidate arrested for DWI

A Democratic congressional candidate in Arkansas has been arrested on suspicion of driving while intoxicated after he was pulled over in Fayetteville.

Click here to read the full story.

Thank you for being a part of the FOX16.com community! Everyone is invited and encouraged to comment here but comments containing the following will be removed:
1. Racist or bigoted slurs
2. Abusive, off-topic, or foul language
3. Slander, defamation, and personal attacks
4. Spam or advertising
5. Advocating or celebrating the death, illness, or misfortune of any person, public figure or otherwise
6. Comments posted with the explicit intention of provoking others
7. Content that may infringe the copyright or intellectual property rights of others or other applicable laws or regulations.

Post a Comment

Comments

Dude III - 8/10/2012 10:39 PM

0 Votes

Report User

Just because he refused the test does not mean he was drung some people do get offended when one of the blue gods imply they are drunk, And under Ark. saw you do have the right to refuse the test. If you read the first of the article it reads that he is a lawyer.

pat72209 - 8/10/2012 6:23 PM

2 Votes

Report User

If he wasn't DRUNK, he SHOULD HAVE BEEN WILLING TO TAKE THE TEST then it would be OVER.. He is lying, just like a politician....we have enough weak politicians, we don't need him.

omnc655 - 8/10/2012 5:18 PM

2 Votes

Report User

i.iam knot DrUnk...i jus can.t WaLk..do YOU know Who i am???

ArkansasYankee - 8/10/2012 4:42 PM

1 Vote

Report User

Hey Herb; you weren't smoking any herb were you?

ArkansasYankee - 8/10/2012 4:39 PM

1 Vote

Report User

I feel like a democrat all of a sudden. Must be because I just cast 5 votes! I gave all of you a vote. If he wasn't drunk, then why didn't he submit to a blood alcohol test? Then he would have proof that he wasn't drunk. That's right, he's a former state legislater; above the laws they make.

Mr Tom - 8/10/2012 3:41 PM

3 Votes

Report User

You and I, if confronted with the same exact situation and refused the test the lawmakers created to test the sobrity of an individual, we would automtically be considered guilty as charged simply because of the refusal to cooperate with a law inforcement officer. I wonder why he feels he should be treated any diffent? We shall see huh?

protector20 - 8/10/2012 2:35 PM

2 Votes

Report User

Good luck with what remains of your campaign.

ender929 - 8/10/2012 1:38 PM

3 Votes

Report User

A potential lawmaker who is unwilling to comply with the law. I can't imagine why anyone would want to elect an official who is unwilling to comply with the laws his peers had enacted, and then refuse to comply with the request of a LEO. I wonder what the spin will be.