Download: RSS | Email Alerts | Text Alerts | Mobile
 

City meets with owner of house accidentally demolished


Story Comments Share
Tags:
Updated: 9/21/2012 9:41 pm Published: 9/21/2012 9:39 pm
As Jessie Vernon and his wife walk up the stairs to city hall, he tries to leave his anger outside.

"I have to just keep peace in me because it will do nothing but destroy me. That's more destruction on me," said Vernon.

And he's is dealing with plenty of destruction. Earlier this month, Youngblood Demolition and Excavating took down a vacant house on Vernon's property without waiting on the city code enforcer to confirm the address. Turns out, Youngblood demolished the wrong house.

"Due to his negligence, it's caused me a lot of stress that i have to deal with," said Vernon.

Friday, Vernon met with city leaders behind closed doors to develop a strategy to help both the city and Vernon get this accidental mess off the property.

"I'm just hoping that the city will put pressure on him and make him do what he's supposed to be doing," said Vernon.

After the meeting, Assistant City Manager Bryan Day explained why this situation is a touchy one, even though the city followed all the proper procedures.

"Our goal is to have safe and vibrant neighborhoods and his house is demolished," said Day. "It's still sitting on the site. The contractor hasn't cleaned up."

That's because neither Youngblood nor Vernon can reach a deal they're both happy with.

On the phone today, Grant Youngblood said, "I offered Mr. Vernon more than a fair deal including replacing the house and cleaning up the property. If he wants any money, he'll have to take me to court."

As for the house originally slated for demolition, it's still standing and the city is looking to hire a new contractor for the job.

Story Comments Share
7 Comment(s)
Comments: Show | Hide

Here are the most recent story comments.View All

The views expressed here do not necessarily represent those of FOX16 - Breaking News and Weather to Plan Your Day for Little Rock and Central Arkansas

itsjustme - 9/24/2012 9:31 AM
0 Votes
Butch, the city is NOT liable for this, believe it or not. The contractor is required to have a certain amount of liability insurance as well as being bonded. Cities write these bid documents covering their butts. They state that the contractor is liable for any and all screw ups. I have dealt with this way to many times, its always on the contractors back, not the cities. Municipalities have a thing called tort immunity that covers their asses.

BigBadDaddy12 - 9/22/2012 6:33 PM
1 Vote
dud take the money they offered you and rebuild.. You wasn't going, nor have you started any repairs, you heard about it and now you see dollar sign's $$$$$$$$. and you know I'm right!

Butch54 - 9/22/2012 8:50 AM
4 Votes
The City acted like they did every thing right and may have. They hired this guy though. That makes them just as liable as the contractor. They have insurance for things like this. The city needs to step up. Get an appraisers to give a value. Which will not be much due to the condition of the house. Turn it over to their insurance. Let the insurance company handle it. That's what they get paid for. Let them recover from the contractor. This is a simple damage case. Their will be no milking as a lot of nuts will say. He is only due what he is damaged and probably legal cost of recovering it. No pain and suffering and all that other stuff that goes with personal injury. I think the biggest thing being left out is why didn't they just call the insurance in right off. The city or contractor should have right off. Maybe someone didn't have any. That would fall on the city as they are responsible for checking these things. You hire someone you have to make sure they have their responsibilities in order. I'll bet one of the requirements for getting a contract with the city is to have liability insurance. Simple insurance claim. That's all this is.

dirkdigler - 9/22/2012 6:59 AM
0 Votes
Must have been a run down property for the contractor to mistake it for the one meant for demolition. The neighbors are probably happy.

dirkdigler - 9/22/2012 6:57 AM
0 Votes
It must have been a pretty run down property for the contractor to mistake it for the one meant to be demolished.

DK1701 - 9/22/2012 6:46 AM
3 Votes
Yes, because violence and threats of physical harm are totally the way to go in civilized society. Bravo, NativeSon, on making yourself look so wonderfully educated. If the contractor is offering to clean up the property *and* replace the demolished home, then I don't see the problem. Just another example of someone trying to milk a situation for everything he can get.

NativeSon - 9/22/2012 1:32 AM
0 Votes
You just have to have the proper negotiation strategy! "Youngblood you have twenty-four hours to give me my money or I bury you in a concrete coffin in the Arkansas River!" Then twenty-five hours later follow through.
The links below are paid advertisements. FOX16 is not responsible for their content.
Current Conditions
69°
High: 92° | Low: 68°
Clear
Inergize Digital This site is hosted and managed by Inergize Digital.
Mobile advertising for this site is available on Local Ad Buy.