Download: RSS | Email Alerts | Text Alerts | Mobile
 

Judge removes himself from lottery ticket trial


Story Comments Share
Tags:
Updated: 5/25/2012 5:16 pm Published: 5/24/2012 12:09 pm
SEARCY, AR - White County circuit judge Thomas Hughes removed himself from the lottery ticket trial case on Friday citing irregularities in the proceedings that could result in the questioning of his impartiality on the case.

Attorneys for Sharon Jones, who claims to have found the $1 million ticket in the trash says they were pleased with the judge's decision on Friday.

"We think this is the right thing to do," James Simpson says. "This gives us a fresh chance to present evidence in the case going forward with a new judge.  We think the case will run much smoother now."

Judge orders new trial in lottery ticket dispute

WHITE COUNTY, AR - A new trial means new hope for a Beebe woman who claims she found a $1 million lottery ticket.

White County Circuit Judge Thomas Hughes ordered a new trial Thursday. Sharon Jones, who says she found the winning ticket in a waste bin at the Super 1 Stop last July, says she's hopeful the verdict could go her way this time. "It's been a terrible 10 months." Jones is very happy there will be a new trial and hopes this time for a different outcome.

Judge Hughes awarded the $1 million lottery ticket Jones claims she found to Sharon Duncan, who claims she bought the ticket and threw it away.

William Jones, Sharon's husband, claims this case has always been about greed on the plaintiff's part. "It was basically finders keepers, losers weepers."

But now the new trial has the potential to bring peace and justice for the Jones family. Their attorney, Jimmy Simpson, says had the judge not made the decision first, he would have filed a request for a new trial. He says there is more to the story. "We're asking Judge Hughes to recuse himself from the case."

Sharon and William Jones say this entire process has been hurtful, and they're ready for closure. "I really don't think it'll go as far as a new trial. I think it is going to be recognized there's nothing there to try."

Simpson says his feeling is that a new trail will end in a verdict favorable for Sharon Jones.

Messages for the attorney for Sharon Duncan, the woman Judge Hughes awarded the money to, were not returned.

The motion for recusal filed this afternoon cites several reasons including bias, inappropriate actions and conversations on behalf of Judge Hughes.

No new trial date has been set yet.
Story Comments Share
18 Comment(s)
Comments: Show | Hide

Here are the most recent story comments.View All

The views expressed here do not necessarily represent those of FOX16 - Breaking News and Weather to Plan Your Day for Little Rock and Central Arkansas

jenni - 6/1/2012 8:04 PM
0 Votes
Ok if the lady that trew the ticket away its not hers anymore. Let me ask if she threw some food away in the trash would she fight that person for the food back? The lady that found it should keep it and enjoy her life.

razbg - 5/26/2012 7:44 AM
0 Votes
I have been in court for these hearing and what strikes me as odd, is there has been no evidence presented that proves Ms. Duncan was the purchaser of the ticket. Why wasnt there video evidence producted showing her buying the ticket at the time the lottery shows it was sold???

razbg - 5/26/2012 7:03 AM
0 Votes
1

teeboo56 - 5/25/2012 5:53 PM
0 Votes
Well now this gets more interesting by the day. The judge bows out of re-trail due to possible impartiality. Gee, you think??? Okay let's start over, if this verdict is the opposite of the one already issued do we do a 2 out 3 ruling?????

wpsark - 5/25/2012 10:36 AM
0 Votes
why would you trust those scanners in the first place? I don't.

jwLonokeCo - 5/25/2012 10:35 AM
2 Votes
Solomon would have had this figured out in a matter of minutes with no attorney fees.

dana2 - 5/24/2012 9:20 PM
1 Vote
stupid is as stupid does... one mans trash is anothers treasure... By time the lawyers get through, there won't be any money. Whoever signed the ticket gets the money, if I had a ticket and it said I was a million dollar winner, my tail would be driving to the main office to collect.

TonyThom - 5/24/2012 4:54 PM
0 Votes
so she scanned the ticket and it said "not a winner"? That's amazing. Amazing in the sense she is the only one who has ever claimed the machine said that. Never mind the fact the lottery has repeatedly explained the machines have never malfunctioned.

icom319 - 5/24/2012 4:47 PM
1 Vote
the lottery board should pay both party the million dollars because if the computer had not said that ticket was not a winner the lady would not have put oin teash. another reason is if the lottery ticket had not been claim the lottery board would had a million dollars to do as they wish. some one pocket or to some3 company for something else

spray - 5/24/2012 2:41 PM
0 Votes
Ms. Duncan should get the million dollars. She is on camera scanning the barcode and the machine told her it was not a winner so she discarded it.I have had those machine misread the barcode before and tell me a ticket was or was not a winner when it wasn't or was. That is why I always scan the ticket twice to make sure
The links below are paid advertisements. FOX16 is not responsible for their content.
Current Conditions
71°
High: 93° | Low: 69°
Clear
Inergize Digital This site is hosted and managed by Inergize Digital.
Mobile advertising for this site is available on Local Ad Buy.