Download: RSS | Email Alerts | Text Alerts | Mobile
 

Same sex marriage debate


Story Comments Share
Tags:
Updated: 2/10/2012 2:07 pm Published: 2/09/2012 9:41 pm

LITTLE ROCK, AR - "The idea that you can redefine marriage in this way is simply a fad," said Dr. Jennifer Morse with The Ruth Institute during a heated same sex marriage debate, Thursday at the UALR School of Law.

"Marriage is not a conservative value," LGBT lawyer Christina Sun argued back. "It's not a liberal value. It's a family value."

This debate over same sex marriage is not the first time Dr. Morse and Sun have entered into a heated discussion.

"The findings are very clear," said Sun. "That there is absolutely no difference between parenting of same sex couples as there is by heterosexual couples."

Sun sparred with Morse in 2008 over Arkansas' Act One - a measure struck down by the State Supreme Court that would have made it illegal for unmarried couples to adopt.

"What we're implicitly saying here is that biology doesn't matter to anybody. that biology isn't supposed to matter to anybody," said Dr. Morse.

Morse believes marriage is defined by the public function, or the purpose of procreating, and not about sexuality at all.

"Same sex couples have children differently than opposite couples do therefore it makes sense to have somewhat different legal institutions to protect the rights and responsibilities that are associated with that," argued Dr. Morse.

"Our nation is premised on the idea of inclusiveness," said Sun. "Not excluding people."

With the California Federal Appeals Court striking down the ban on same sex marriage the same week the state of Washington works to legalize it, the conversation is far from over both at UALR and all throughout the country.

Story Comments Share
10 Comment(s)
Comments: Show | Hide

Here are the most recent story comments.View All

The views expressed here do not necessarily represent those of FOX16 - Breaking News and Weather to Plan Your Day for Little Rock and Central Arkansas

raerae - 2/11/2012 2:01 PM
0 Votes
Why is it that all gay people envy regular married people? It’s because they will never have what they have, a normal life. Gay people can NEVER have children, NEVER. That’s why GOD made men and women to fit together because they can have children the natural way. I’m sick of the media and politicians saying everyone has to accept the life style of gays. That’s not true. Less than 800 thousand people are gay and we have over 300 million people that live in the U.S. If it was so accepted then why don’t they put it up to the voters? They never do, the politicians just make it law. What they do in their own home behind closed doors is their business and I don’t care. But don’t push your life style in my face with laws and tell me I have to accept it. I don’t and I won’t and NO law can make me.

Butch54 - 2/10/2012 11:29 AM
0 Votes
My daughter has a wife. I've known about her since she was a teen. You know what. She is educated. Makes about 80 grand a year with a major medical company located in Dallas. Her wife has the same problem with education, job, and who she works for. Wish my straight children were as smart. Although it did bother me at first. So be it. Oh and if you want to marry an animal you might need to check it where they work.

dilligaf - 2/10/2012 10:12 AM
0 Votes
While I do not condone homosexuality, I do see the gay community's point. Why should the government be allowed to determine who marries who? If two gay people choose they want to make a life commitment to one another, let them do that. It is perfectly fine, although not fully accepted, that people of different races marry, so the gay community should be allowed to carry out their rights and beliefs. The last time I checked, being gay does not make you an atheist, and yes many gay people do believe in God. Being gay is their lifestyle. The government has no right to tell them they can not be together legally on paper. I think the government should worry about more important things like jobs, the economy, crime, etc. Meddlesome SOBS.

centralAR - 2/10/2012 9:02 AM
0 Votes
Well said Pugsnotdrugs!!! homosexuals still believe in god 09er that really does not play a part in this.

pat72209 - 2/10/2012 8:58 AM
1 Vote
What was my point, you ask? It does not make sense for same sex people to have sex...not an alternative lifestyle....LOVE THE PERSON, NOT ACCEPT THEIR CHOICE OF HAVING SEX.

pat72209 - 2/10/2012 8:56 AM
0 Votes
Recently I have found that my grandaughter who was raised in a Christian home...her parents are missionaries in Honduras at this time....has decided the "God thing" is ridiculous....SHE IS A MEMBER OF A NUMBER OF HONOR SOCIETIES IN HER COLLEGE, HAS A DOUBLE DEGREE IN PSYCHOLOGY, GOING FOR HER MASTERS...36 YEARS OLD...I am at a loss...Sure you can make a few points against creation, BUT we have to accept some things on Faith and NO MATTER WHAT THE BEGINNING WAS "IT HAD TO BE GOD". Our world didn't develop out of an explosion or any other molecular incident!!!

exegete - 2/10/2012 8:28 AM
4 Votes
Where does the "standard" hold? Sodomites cannot naturally produce offspring. Physiologically, male-male or female-female, is not the natural order of creation. More than that, God created the natural order. Male for female and female for male. When you get to the point where you will not acknowledge how we are designed by God, you have started down the road where anything goes and you will not be satisfied until you pull everyone down to your own perverted ways. We may site studies, facts, reason, statistics, etc.... It will not convince someone who will not acknowledge that which is obvious. Legitimizing sodomite relationships will lead us to the next step in our downward moral spiral. Will it be the plea to naturalize relationships with animals, children, "Angels?" For those of you know the Lord, plead for the light of the gospel to penetrate darkened hearts.

pugsnotdrugs - 2/10/2012 8:06 AM
0 Votes
There's a difference between a person marrying an animal versus a person marrying a person. Two people can give their consent where as an animal or child could not. People are trying to define marriage for what it is. A bond of love between two people which is recognized by the state. It shouldn't matter which gender you are if you want to be with the person you love. Divorce rate is so high these days anyways so what do people honestly have to lose?

yourekidding - 2/10/2012 7:19 AM
4 Votes
There have to be guidelines or humans can marry animals or adults marry children. If one thing is acceptable all have to be acceptable. This politcal correctness is way out of control. Let's stop this madness!!!

yourekidding - 2/10/2012 7:17 AM
4 Votes
I suppose it will be ok for humans to marry animals too or adults to marry children. There needs to be guidelines or anything is acceptable. Define marriage for what it is, the bonding of heterosexual couples of an appropriate age.
The links below are paid advertisements. FOX16 is not responsible for their content.
Current Conditions
74°
High: 84° | Low: 56°
Mostly Cloudy
Inergize Digital This site is hosted and managed by Inergize Digital.
Mobile advertising for this site is available on Local Ad Buy.