Download: RSS | Email Alerts | Text Alerts | Mobile
 

SoS office now says Todd's casino item off ballot


Story Comments Share
(file photo)
(file photo)
Tags:
Updated: 8/15/2012 7:55 pm Published: 8/15/2012 3:11 pm
LITTLE ROCK, Ark. (AP) - A proposed constitutional amendment to allow casino gambling was bounced Wednesday over concerns about the ballot's wording, but the measure's backer says she still intends to put the matter before voters.

The proposal by professional poker player Nancy Todd would give her exclusive rights to casinos to Crittenden, Franklin, Miller and Pulaski counties.

Secretary of State Mark Martin ruled Wednesday in favor of a challenge to Todd's plan that said the wording on the ballot failed to fully explain the scope of her proposal.

Todd is still gathering signatures of registered voters and faces a deadline Monday to reach the 78,133 she must have to get the proposal on the ballot.

"This does not change one thing we are doing," Todd said.

Todd said her lawyers will review Martin's ruling and then decide how to address it.

Todd said that if the only hurdle is the ballot wording problem, "I'll take it."

Martin spokesman Mark Myers said in an email that Todd "could go to court" to try to have Martin's ruling overturned. State law also allows for corrections to wording in such cases.

Martin ruled on a challenge by the group Stop Casinos Now, an organization chaired by Chuck Lange, a former president of the Arkansas Sheriff's Organization. The group is funded by Southland Park greyhound track in West Memphis, which has casino-style games.

Southland gave the group $87,347.50, according to a filing with the state Ethics Commission. Southland and Oaklawn Park horse track in Hot Springs offer "electronic games of skill" that are allowed under Arkansas law. Todd's proposed operation would offer competition and would overturn the law that enabled local voters to approve expanded gambling in Hot Springs and West Memphis.

The group argued that Todd's proposal shouldn't be allowed on the ballot because its ballot title doesn't fully reflect what the amendment would do and because the casinos would hold a monopoly and not be regulated by the state.

Martin turned away the regulation and monopoly arguments. But he agreed that the ballot title doesn't fully convey the scope of what the amendment would accomplish since it would repeal the electronic games of skill law.

"We are pleased today that the Secretary of State has agreed with our petition that Nancy Todd's ballot title is not fair or complete. Arkansas voters deserved to know the truth about Vegas-insider Nancy Todd's casino plan for our state," Lange said in a news release.

Attorney General Dustin McDaniel wrote an opinion on Lange's challenge in which he agreed that the ballot title omitted a provision by which the amendment would repeal the law that allowed Southland and Oaklawn to have electronic games of skill.

McDaniel wrote that the repeal would have given "a reasonable voter serious ground for reflection," which is the standard for determining the validity of ballot title wording.

Martin's office has certified 23,616 signatures submitted by Todd as being from registered voters. Todd was given 30 days to bring that total to the 78,133 she needs. If she doesn't reach that threshold, her proposal will not reach voters anyway.

One other casino proposal could also end up on the Nov. 6 ballot.

A proposal by Michael Wasserman would give him exclusive rights to operate casinos in seven counties.

Election officials found last month that the Texas businessman's measure fell short of the signatures required and would not qualify for the ballot. Wasserman has filed a lawsuit challenging that finding.

(Copyright 2012 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.)
Story Comments Share
7 Comment(s)
Comments: Show | Hide

Here are the most recent story comments.View All

The views expressed here do not necessarily represent those of FOX16 - Breaking News and Weather to Plan Your Day for Little Rock and Central Arkansas

jreppoh - 8/16/2012 3:40 PM
3 Votes
Southland and Oaklawn sound like a monopoly to me.The ballet was approved to collect signatures same as the pot one so I want to vote on it. This crap happens every election. Let the people speak. If a group wants to protest then they should have to collect signatures too! Not just use money that the dog track gave them!!!!!!!!

ArkansasYankee - 8/16/2012 11:05 AM
2 Votes
Never been to a casino; but I believe people should have that right. Other states have them. Same with prostitution, and medicinal weed. Let's get with the 21st Century AR leaders. They could build a casino next door to me, and I wouldn't bother going. Might make a little dough on parking though! I'm with you itsjustme; why "exclusive" rights? Someone in the state government getting a little payola on this one. Looks like the payola has gone out the window though. Sos has concerns over the wording. How many times have we heard that one when Arkansans want something on the ballot?

wpsark - 8/16/2012 10:34 AM
2 Votes
I like casinos and all but where are they going to put them in Pulaski county??? Are they going to force people out of there homes in the name of eminent domain??Why not just build them on the other side of the river from Tunica & Greenville? We'll still get our tax dollars that way...I'm opposed to them being in Pulaski county..

itsjustme - 8/16/2012 7:34 AM
2 Votes
My main problem with this is that these two want "exclusive rights" to be the only ones allowed to operate casinos. I agree casinos would be good for Arkansas, but dont give one person the monopoly. Nancy Todd will not bring us a good casino, she will bring us these little ass "poker palaces". We need casinos like Tunica has, real casinos.

jreppoh - 8/15/2012 9:04 PM
2 Votes
If it was approved to collect signatures and they were collected then it is a bunch of bull to then tell them no.A small group of people that was given lots of money from the Greyhound dog track should not be telling the people of Arkansas what we can have. Heck I feel sorry for the Greyhounds! I want to vote on it. We need a big shake up in government as they are suppose to be to be working for the people.

ArkansasYankee - 8/15/2012 7:36 PM
1 Vote
I made a comment about someone keeping the weed proposal off the ballot. I mentioned a judge or a DA; forgot about the SoS. How many times in the past have they kept something off the ballot because the wording wasn't correct, the "title" was wrong, etc.? The people spoke when they gathered enough signatures; we need to get rid of these people running our state,and get some people in there that believe in "we the people".

mikesmothers - 8/15/2012 4:36 PM
2 Votes
Let the casinos go ahead and build, people that want to gamble will either go where they are or find another way to amuse themselves. It might actually generate some jobs either from the buiding or the people needed to work in them.
The links below are paid advertisements. FOX16 is not responsible for their content.
Current Conditions
88°
High: 95° | Low: 67°
Partly Cloudy
Inergize Digital This site is hosted and managed by Inergize Digital.
Mobile advertising for this site is available on Local Ad Buy.