Download: RSS | Email Alerts | Text Alerts | Mobile
 

Toss murder conviction due to tweets, lawyer says


Story Comments Share
(File)
(File)
Updated: 11/17/2011 10:40 am Published: 11/17/2011 10:40 am

LITTLE ROCK, Ark. (AP) — A lawyer for a death row inmate says the Arkansas Supreme Court should overturn his murder conviction because a judge wouldn't bounce a juror caught tweeting during his 2010 trial.

Erickson Dimas-Martinez's lawyer on Thursday asked the court to overturn his client's conviction for the slaying of a Centerton teenager.

Dimas-Martinez's attorney says the juror was caught tweeting during the trial despite the judge's instruction to not to post on the Internet or otherwise or communicate with anyone about the case.

An assistant attorney general defended the judge's decision to not dismiss the juror and said the tweets were merely about the juror's feelings and not about deliberations.

Dimas-Martinez's lawyer also argued that the judge should have dismissed another juror who was caught sleeping during the trial.

 

©2011 Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Story Comments Share
7 Comment(s)
Comments: Show | Hide

Here are the most recent story comments.View All

The views expressed here do not necessarily represent those of FOX16 - Breaking News and Weather to Plan Your Day for Little Rock and Central Arkansas

myidea - 11/18/2011 7:10 AM
0 Votes
so what give him the needle

beachbum2 - 11/17/2011 6:37 PM
1 Vote
Leave it to an attorney with the IQ of a jackass to come up with some lame crap such as this. Attorney's pure ignorance costs this country millions of wated money every year.

protector20 - 11/17/2011 6:10 PM
3 Votes
Maybe the juror should have been tweeting. Of course, the defendant shouldn't have been killing either.

spyingonyou - 11/17/2011 5:00 PM
2 Votes
Which is the lesser evil, tweeting or killing ?

spyingonyou - 11/17/2011 4:53 PM
2 Votes
This death row inmate had another persons life in his hand and chose to kill.The juror should not have been tweeting but, that don't change the fact that he killed a teenager.No excuse ! Let the guilty verdict stand !

happy to be me - 11/17/2011 4:04 PM
1 Vote
The man may be guilty. But the judge should have thrown both of them out.These people have someones life in their hands. And if they are not responsible enough to take it serious. They do not need to be there. The judge should be very strict on the jurry. And hold yhem to rules. Rules were mdae for a reason. You could very well have a innocent person life in your hands.

Razorback - 11/17/2011 2:34 PM
3 Votes
I know that if I was on trial, I'd want the jury to be paying attention. Idiot should be made to pay the costs of the wasted trial.
The links below are paid advertisements. FOX16 is not responsible for their content.
Current Conditions
64°
High: 82° | Low: 62°
Partly Cloudy
Inergize Digital This site is hosted and managed by Inergize Digital.
Mobile advertising for this site is available on Local Ad Buy.